Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com

When equipment fails, people want answers.
What broke?
Why did it break?
Could it have been prevented?
Who is responsible?
Equipmentdoes not fail "by accident"?
There is always a cause.

Equipment failure analysis is the process of finding out:
• What component failed
• How it failed
• When it failed
• Why it failed
• Whether the failure caused the incident
This includes cranes, outriggers, booms, wire rope, rigging, hydraulic systems, structural members, and supporting ground systems.
We look at the facts.
Not guesses.
Not assumptions.
Facts.

In crane and heavy construction cases, failures often involve:
•Structural steel cracking or failure
•Hydraulic system malfunction
•Wire rope or rigging failure
•Load chart misuse or miscalculation
•Outrigger or ground support collapse
•Maintenance or inspection deficiencies
•Improper assembly or configuration
Every failure tells a story.
The job is to read it correctly.

Failure analysis must be systematic and defensible.
It includes:
• Scene review and documentation
• Photographic and video evaluation
• Review of inspection and maintenance records
• Manufacturer specifications and load charts
• OSHA, ANSI, and ASME standard comparison
• Operational decision analysis
• Evaluation of ground bearing capacity and stability
Opinions are formed only after reviewing the available data and applicable industry standards.

Equipment does not operate in a laboratory.
It operates:
• On uneven ground
• Under time pressure
• In changing weather
• With real crews
• On active construction sites
Understanding how cranes actually operate in the field is critical to determining whether a failure was mechanical, operational, environmental, or a combination of factors.
Equipment failure cases often require answers to:
• Was the equipment properly maintained?
• Were inspections performed correctly?
• Was the crane configured properly?
• Did the ground support meet required bearing capacity?
• Did operator actions contribute to the failure?
• Was manufacturer guidance followed?
• Could the failure have been prevented?
These are not checklist questions.
They require technical evaluation grounded in industry practice.
Failure analysis must align with:
• OSHA regulations
• ANSI and ASME standards
• Manufacturer requirements
• Accepted crane industry practices
Opinions must be clear, logical, and supported by documentation and operational reality.
That is what makes them defensible.
Available for:
• Crane collapse matters
• Structural failure disputes
• Rigging and load drop incidents
• Insurance loss analysis
• Subrogation matters
• Construction litigation
Independent. Objective. Grounded in field experience.
Machines do not have opinions.
They respond to physics.
When something breaks, there is a reason.
The job is to find it.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.